Medicine in Practice Clinical scenario training for primary care pharmacy

Funding primary care pharmacy training: a 2026/27 guide for ICBs

Medicine in Practice · 26 August 2026

commissioning ICB funding primary care pharmacy training hubs workforce development

Funding primary care pharmacy training is rarely a matter of finding one national pot labelled "training platform". The more useful question is whether a defined workforce intervention supports an ICB priority, has an eligible commissioning route and comes with measures strong enough to justify the spend. This guide sets out the main 2026/27 routes to discuss with finance, primary care, medicines optimisation and the local training hub.

Key points

  • ICB core and primary-care transformation allocations are the most plausible general routes where a programme supports an agreed local priority.
  • NHS England expects ICBs and training hubs to identify local development needs and commission appropriate programmes, but local approval and procurement still apply.
  • Ring-fenced funding for community pharmacy prescribing has a narrower purpose and should not be treated as a general workforce-training budget.
  • The Growth and Skills Levy funds approved apprenticeships through approved providers, not a standalone software licence.
  • Ask the budget holder to confirm eligibility in writing before describing any funding route as available.

Start with the outcome, not the product

A credible proposal begins with a local problem: inconsistent onboarding across practices, variation in high-risk-medicines processes, insufficient evidence of learning, or a cohort that needs role-specific development. It then defines who is included, what will change, how implementation will work and when the ICB will decide whether to stop, adjust or scale. Our business-case guide provides that structure.

ICB core and primary-care development funding

NHS England's primary care service development guidance says ICBs should work with training hubs to identify local training and development needs and commission programmes. It also explains that former training-hub funding was moved into ICB core allocations rather than remaining a separate ring-fenced pot. This creates local flexibility, not automatic entitlement: the proposal still needs to fit the ICB's plan, governance and value tests.

The 2026–29 planning framework emphasises neighbourhood health, prevention, digital delivery, workforce and productivity. A proposal is stronger when it explains its contribution to one or more of those priorities without promising a clinical outcome the training alone cannot prove.

PCN and employer routes

Practices, PCNs, federations and training hubs may also commission development directly where it supports their workforce plan. For roles governed by the Network Contract DES, check the current specification and approved-pathway requirements. Medicine in Practice is supplementary simulation and reporting; it does not replace an approved education pathway, employer induction, supervision or workplace competence assessment.

Restricted routes that need care

Community pharmacy prescribing implementation funding

NHS England has described a 2026/27 allocation to ICBs or clusters for introducing prescribing elements in national community pharmacy services. Its purpose is specific: governance, onboarding and monitoring for that implementation. It should not be presented as a general GP-practice or PCN training pot unless the commissioner confirms the proposed spend is within scope.

Growth and Skills Levy

The levy supports eligible approved apprenticeships delivered through approved arrangements. A standalone e-learning licence is not itself an apprenticeship. A partnership with an approved provider may be possible, but eligibility must be established through that route rather than implied by the platform.

Education placement tariffs

Education tariffs generally follow eligible clinical placements and placement providers. They may support a partnership around a qualifying placement, but they are not a direct subsidy for an unrelated external learning licence.

Questions for the budget holder

  • Which local priority and allocation would fund the work?
  • Is the budget recurrent, non-recurrent or ring-fenced?
  • Who is authorised to approve the spend and procurement route?
  • What evidence must be reported, to whom and by what date?
  • Does the commissioner need a DPIA, accessibility evidence, security questionnaire or supplier onboarding?
  • What happens at the end of the pilot if the measures are, or are not, met?

A sensible first step

Commission a defined 6- or 12-month pilot, often 50–100 learners across 2–4 PCNs, with baseline, 30-, 60- and 90-day adoption reviews and an end-of-pilot report. The exact cohort should follow the local problem and budget. See our evaluation framework and ICB partnership route.

Sources and further reading

Last reviewed 26 August 2026. Funding rules and local allocations change; confirm the current position with the relevant commissioner and budget holder.


Explore the curriculum More articles